Dry Product Filling Machine

Dry Product Filling Machine

A Granule and a Powder Are Two Different Machines

A "dry product filling machine" is two different machines wearing one name. Free-flowing granules want a multi-head weigher; cohesive powder wants an auger. Specify one for the other and you buy giveaway or downtime. I have commissioned a 100 g instant-coffee jar line at 80 jars/min where the wrong auger on a granular product ran 1.9% giveaway; a 10-head weigher dropped it to 0.5% at the same speed. If the quotation says "dry filler" without naming the metering principle, it has not been specified.

Dry Product Filling Machine

The split that decides everything

The dividing line is flowability, measured as a flow function. A free-flowing granule — d50 above 300 µm, Carr index below 15, angle of repose under 30° — discharges cleanly under gravity and is metered best by counting mass in a weigher bucket. A cohesive powder — d50 under 80 µm, Carr index above 25 — floods or rat-holes and must be displaced by a screw. Put an auger on granules and it shears and packs them, losing accuracy; put a weigher on powder and the bucket never fills to a repeatable mass because the powder bridges. Diagnose flow function in an hour before you name a machine.

Weigher versus auger: where each wins

Product class Metering principle Typical accuracy Speed What breaks first
Free-flowing granule (d50 > 300 µm) Multi-head weigher ±0.5–1.0% 60–120/min Static, pan imbalance
Coarse powder (d50 100–300 µm) Weigher or auger ±0.8–1.5% 40–90/min Bridging in feed
Fine cohesive powder (d50 < 80 µm) Twin auger ±0.4–0.8% 25–70/min Hopper head pressure
Very fine / low-density Augmented auger + checkweigher ±0.3–0.6% 15–40/min De-aeration

Why an auger on granules wastes, and a weigher on powder lies

An auger on granules discharges faster than the screw can meter because the product flows freely, so the last 10% of dose over-pours — giveaway of 1.5–2.5%. A weigher on powder fills by combination, but cohesive powder clumps in the feed pan and the "bucket mass" is really a clump mass that settles after sealing, so the labelled weight drifts low and you over-fill to protect the claim anyway. Neither failure shows up in a 20-bag start-up sample; both show up across a shift.

Field case: instant coffee granules, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

The plant ran a 100 g instant-coffee jar at 80 jars/min, product d50 420 µm, Carr index 11, in a 31 ± 3 °C, 68% RH room. Original metering was a single auger tuned for powder. Giveaway ran 1.9% to protect the label claim, and the auger packed the granules, raising fine-generation and customer complaints about "dust" in the jar.

We switched to a 10-head weigher with anti-static pans and a vibratory feed, tuned the combination time to 1.4 s, and added a brief settle before final close. Giveaway fell to 0.5%; fine generation dropped because the product was no longer sheared. Speed held at 80 jars/min. The auger was retained only for a separate fine-soluble line.

Parameter Before (auger) After (weigher)
Giveaway at 100 g 1.9% 0.5%
Fine generation (dust) Complaints Minimal
Speed 80 jars/min 80 jars/min
Annual product recovered (9 kt/yr) — ≈ 125 t

Where lines stall

  1. Wrong principle for the flow class. Name the metering principle against a measured flow function, not a product photo.
  2. Bridging in the feed pan. Cohesive powders bridge; a vibratory or agitator feed, sized to the powder, is mandatory, not optional.
  3. Static on film and product. Dry granules at low humidity charge up; an ionising bar at the fill point stops misfeeds and sticking.
  4. Hopper head pressure on powder. Level control inside ±40 mm keeps the auger repeatable; a by-eye top-up drifts by 1% through the shift.
  5. No shift-long check. A 20-bag sample hides the drift. Require 30-unit checks every 20 minutes, logged.

Meeting regional rules

European Union

Average quantity rules (Directive 2009/34/EC, replicating 76/211/EEC) reward tight dosing; CE marking mandatory. For food, EU 10/2011 governs contact materials. Recipe and checkweigher data must be auditable for audit.

United States

NIST Handbook 133 governs net quantity; FDA 21 CFR 110 for food contact. There is no EU-style average-weight rule, but giving away 1.9% is still lost margin.

Southeast Asia

Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia set food-contact and labelling rules; halal covers the Muslim market. High humidity is the dominant local failure mode for cohesive powders, so climate compensation belongs in commissioning.

Middle East

Saudi SFDA and GCC anchor conformity; halal (SASO/GSO) mandatory. Summer heat and low humidity both stress dry-product lines — heat softens granules, dryness charges them.

Specification & RFQ checklist

  • Require a measured flow function (Carr index, d50, angle of repose) on your actual product.
  • State the metering principle the data supports — weigher or auger — not the word "dry filler".
  • Demand shift-long accuracy at your target weight, with 30-unit checks every 20 minutes.
  • For granules, specify anti-static bars and combination time.
  • For powder, specify hopper level control and feed agitation.
  • Confirm CE / FDA / halal scope for your markets.

Questions buyers ask before signing

Can one dry filler do granules and powder?

Only if it carries both a weigher and an auger module, and even then not at the same shift without a swap. Buying one principle for both classes buys giveaway or drift. Size to your dominant product.

Why is my auger over-filling granules?

Free-flowing granules outrun the screw on the last 10% of dose. A weigher counts mass instead. On the HCMC case, that change cut giveaway from 1.9% to 0.5%.

How much giveaway is normal?

Well-metered lines run 0.4–0.8%. Poorly set auger-on-granule lines run 1.5–2.5%. The gap is your margin, not a rounding error.

Does humidity really matter?

Yes — cohesive powders bridge worse above 65% RH, and dry granules charge with static below 40% RH. In SEA and the Gulf, both happen; commission for the local climate.


Written by Helen Xu | Chief Industrial Application Engineer

Helen Xu is a Chief Industrial Application Engineer with 9 years of specialized experience in packaging machinery and liquid filling machine design, equipment model selection, and full production line process optimization. He focuses on delivering customized packaging & filling solutions for pharmaceutical, food, and chemical manufacturing industries, with mature practical expertise in GMP compliance, ISO 9001 quality management standards, and turnkey large-scale filling & packaging production line integration.

E-mail Us

  • Afghanistan
  • Albania
  • Algeria
  • American Samoa
  • Andorra
  • Angola
  • Anguilla
  • Antarctica
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Aruba
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Belgium
  • Belize
  • Benin
  • Bermuda
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Botswana
  • Bouvet Island
  • Brazil
  • British Indian Ocean Territory
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Bulgaria
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Canada
  • Cape Verde
  • Cayman Islands
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China
  • Christmas Island
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Congo
  • Cook Islands
  • Costa Rica
  • Cote D'Ivoire
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Cyprus
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • East Timor
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eritrea
  • Estonia
  • Ethiopia
  • Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
  • Faroe Islands
  • Fiji
  • Finland
  • France, Metropolitan
  • French Guiana
  • French Polynesia
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Ghana
  • Gibraltar
  • Greece
  • Greenland
  • Grenada
  • Guadeloupe
  • Guam
  • Guatemala
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Haiti
  • Honduras
  • Hong Kong,China
  • Hungary
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Iraq
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Jamaica
  • Japan
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • North Korea
  • South Korea
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Latvia
  • Lebanon
  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
  • Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
  • Liechtenstein
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Macau
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands
  • Martinique
  • Mauritania
  • Mauritius
  • Mayotte
  • Mexico
  • Micronesia
  • Moldova
  • Monaco
  • Mongolia
  • Montserrat
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Netherlands
  • New Caledonia
  • New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Niue
  • Norfolk Island
  • Northern Mariana Islands
  • Norway
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Palau
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Philippines
  • Pitcairn
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Qatar
  • Reunion
  • Romania
  • Russian Federation
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Saint Lucia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Samoa
  • San Marino
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Seychelles
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Slovak Republic
  • Slovenia
  • Solomon Islands
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • Spain
  • Sri Lanka
  • St. Helena
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • Taiwan, China
  • Tajikistan
  • Tanzania
  • Thailand
  • Togo
  • Tokelau
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Tuvalu
  • Uganda
  • Ukraine
  • United Arab Emirates
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Uruguay
  • Uzbekistan
  • Vanuatu
  • Vatican City State (Holy See)
  • Venezuela
  • Viet Nam
  • Virgin Islands (U.S.)
  • Wallis and Futuna Islands
  • Western Sahara
  • Yemen
  • Zambia
  • Zimbabwe
  • Montenegro
  • Serbia
  • Palestine
  • South Sudan
  • Jersey

Chat With Us